| Title |
2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul K Whelton, Robert M Carey, Wilbert S Aronow, Donald E Casey, Karen J Collins, Cheryl Dennison Himmelfarb, Sondra M DePalma, Samuel Gidding, Kenneth A Jamerson, Daniel W Jones, Eric J MacLaughlin, Paul Muntner, Bruce Ovbiagele, Sidney C Smith, Crystal C Spencer, Randall S Stafford, Sandra J Taler, Randal J Thomas, Kim A Williams, Jeff D Williamson, Jackson T Wright |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 247 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 17% |
| Spain | 26 | 11% |
| Saudi Arabia | 14 | 6% |
| Mexico | 11 | 4% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 10 | 4% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| India | 6 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Colombia | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 29 | 12% |
| Unknown | 93 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 192 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 11% |
| Scientists | 21 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2,749 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2749 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 360 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 242 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 193 | 7% |
| Researcher | 172 | 6% |
| Other | 142 | 5% |
| Other | 435 | 16% |
| Unknown | 1205 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 641 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 264 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 175 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 67 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 42 | 2% |
| Other | 274 | 10% |
| Unknown | 1286 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1016. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2024.
All research outputs
#16,024
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#42
of 16,932 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#248
of 337,991 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#2
of 279 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,932 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,991 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 279 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.