| Title |
Four ethical priorities for neurotechnologies and AI
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/551159a |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rafael Yuste, Sara Goering, Blaise Agüera y Arcas, Guoqiang Bi, Jose M. Carmena, Adrian Carter, Joseph J. Fins, Phoebe Friesen, Jack Gallant, Jane E. Huggins, Judy Illes, Philipp Kellmeyer, Eran Klein, Adam Marblestone, Christine Mitchell, Erik Parens, Michelle Pham, Alan Rubel, Norihiro Sadato, Laura Specker Sullivan, Mina Teicher, David Wasserman, Anna Wexler, Meredith Whittaker, Jonathan Wolpaw |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 927 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 201 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 74 | 8% |
| Spain | 29 | 3% |
| France | 28 | 3% |
| Germany | 25 | 3% |
| Australia | 24 | 3% |
| Canada | 22 | 2% |
| Brazil | 17 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 15 | 2% |
| Other | 152 | 16% |
| Unknown | 340 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 700 | 76% |
| Scientists | 147 | 16% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 46 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 34 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 450 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 450 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 65 | 14% |
| Researcher | 62 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 51 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 10% |
| Professor | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 67 | 15% |
| Unknown | 133 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 53 | 12% |
| Computer Science | 42 | 9% |
| Engineering | 40 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 7% |
| Psychology | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 104 | 23% |
| Unknown | 154 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#11,946
of 25,930,027 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#1,189
of 99,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179
of 345,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#18
of 1,020 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,930,027 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 345,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,020 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.