↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2007
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 27,543)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Nonpharmaceutical Interventions Implemented by US Cities During the 1918-1919 Influenza Pandemic
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, August 2007
DOI 10.1001/jama.298.6.644
Pubmed ID
Authors

Howard Markel, Harvey B. Lipman, J. Alexander Navarro, Alexandra Sloan, Joseph R. Michalsen, Alexandra Minna Stern, Martin S. Cetron

Abstract

A critical question in pandemic influenza planning is the role nonpharmaceutical interventions might play in delaying the temporal effects of a pandemic, reducing the overall and peak attack rate, and reducing the number of cumulative deaths. Such measures could potentially provide valuable time for pandemic-strain vaccine and antiviral medication production and distribution. Optimally, appropriate implementation of nonpharmaceutical interventions would decrease the burden on health care services and critical infrastructure.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4,076 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Unknown 243 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 54 21%
Student > Master 36 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 9%
Other 23 9%
Professor 22 9%
Other 68 27%
Unknown 29 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 28%
Social Sciences 23 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 12 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 4%
Other 71 28%
Unknown 47 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3415. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2020.
All research outputs
#431
of 15,171,295 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#22
of 27,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7
of 233,492 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#1
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,171,295 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 27,543 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,492 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.