↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Noise-induced hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 744)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
2 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
Title
Noise-induced hearing loss
Published in
Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery, October 2014
DOI 10.1097/moo.0000000000000079
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emily Z. Stucken, Robert S. Hong

Abstract

Up to 30 million workers in the United States are exposed to potentially detrimental levels of noise. Although reliable medications for minimizing or reversing noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) are not currently available, NIHL is entirely preventable. The purpose of this article is to review the epidemiology and pathophysiology of occupational NIHL. We will focus on at-risk populations and discuss prevention programs. Current prevention programs focus on reducing inner ear damage by minimizing environmental noise production and through the use of personal hearing protective devices.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Argentina 1 2%
Unknown 44 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 8 17%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 11%
Unspecified 4 9%
Other 15 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 15%
Unspecified 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 7%
Other 3 7%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,241,886
of 13,777,258 outputs
Outputs from Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery
#11
of 744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,564
of 201,134 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery
#1
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,777,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 744 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,134 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.