| Title |
Exploring the Scope of Post–Intensive Care Syndrome Therapy and Care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care Medicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000525 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Doug Elliott, Judy E. Davidson, Maurene A. Harvey, Anita Bemis-Dougherty, Ramona O. Hopkins, Theodore J. Iwashyna, Jason Wagner, Craig Weinert, Hannah Wunsch, O. Joseph Bienvenu, Gary Black, Susan Brady, Martin B. Brodsky, Cliff Deutschman, Diana Doepp, Carl Flatley, Sue Fosnight, Michelle Gittler, Belkys Teresa Gomez, Robert Hyzy, Deborah Louis, Ruth Mandel, Carol Maxwell, Sean R. Muldoon, Christiane S. Perme, Cynthia Reilly, Marla R. Robinson, Eileen Rubin, David M. Schmidt, Jessica Schuller, Elizabeth Scruth, Eric Siegal, Gayle R. Spill, Sharon Sprenger, John P. Straumanis, Pat Sutton, Sandy M. Swoboda, Martha L. Twaddle, Dale M. Needham |
| Abstract |
Increasing numbers of survivors of critical illness are at risk for physical, cognitive, and/or mental health impairments that may persist for months or years after hospital discharge. The post-intensive care syndrome framework encompassing these multidimensional morbidities was developed at the 2010 Society of Critical Care Medicine conference on improving long-term outcomes after critical illness for survivors and their families. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 117 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 11% |
| Australia | 7 | 6% |
| Canada | 5 | 4% |
| Spain | 5 | 4% |
| Brazil | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 3 | 3% |
| Chile | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 34 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 67 | 57% |
| Scientists | 20 | 17% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 17 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 360 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 17% |
| Researcher | 43 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 12% |
| Other | 28 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 8% |
| Other | 68 | 19% |
| Unknown | 91 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 102 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 81 | 23% |
| Psychology | 21 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 1% |
| Other | 39 | 11% |
| Unknown | 105 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 March 2020.
All research outputs
#566,681
of 25,918,104 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care Medicine
#218
of 9,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,684
of 373,655 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care Medicine
#2
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,918,104 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,655 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.