The Bergstrom et al. study is rippling through the science media this morning and it's not surprising why... http://t.co/H1ojkzdTFw
Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/e2TmmWWtRJ because @sciencemagazine don't cite it properly via @blugger @brembs @McDawg
“This information is of interest to economists who study monopolist pricing” http://t.co/jkRwdLPuKf #OpenAccess via @PNASNews
“This information is of interest to economists who study monopolist pricing” http://t.co/jkRwdLPuKf #OpenAccess via @PNASNews
Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/e2TmmWWtRJ because @sciencemagazine don't cite it properly via @blugger @brembs @McDawg
PNAS | Mobile: Use the link to access pay-per-view options for the article published in PNAS. The abstrac... http://t.co/OvgNpXYGo9 #OA
Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/zhvZciASav
Here's the study on journal ripping off libraries that everyone is talking about http://t.co/VFb2Vhf0zD
Important paper on value for money of commercial v non-profit sci publishers. Guess who wins? http://t.co/3fTsZxaohy
Lees:"Evaluating big deal journal bundles"in PNAS http://t.co/aQFecEsLzo nav artikel in Guardian http://t.co/FBzXIxFX31 (via @alexdenhaan )
Study on which @iansample's report is based is published in PNAS: http://t.co/J05qB30Gk5 Should be widely read 2/3
For OA people - there's no surprises here. Large commercial publishers offer v. poor value http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK Nice to see it in PNAS tho
Study on which @iansample's report is based is published in PNAS: http://t.co/J05qB30Gk5 Should be widely read 2/3
Study on which @iansample's report is based is published in PNAS: http://t.co/J05qB30Gk5 Should be widely read 2/3
RT @kaveh1000 Irony in publishing: "Evaluating big deal journal bundles" in PNAS. Wanna read it? Gotta pay. ;-) http://t.co/L3UxIyAIZD
RT @kaveh1000 Irony in publishing: "Evaluating big deal journal bundles" in PNAS. Wanna read it? Gotta pay. ;-) http://t.co/L3UxIyAIZD
RT @kaveh1000 Irony in publishing: "Evaluating big deal journal bundles" in PNAS. Wanna read it? Gotta pay. ;-) http://t.co/L3UxIyAIZD
Lees:"Evaluating big deal journal bundles"in PNAS http://t.co/aQFecEsLzo nav artikel in Guardian http://t.co/FBzXIxFX31 (via @alexdenhaan )
"Evaluating big deal journal bundles". Freedom of Info. Act requests > data about library / publisher deals http://t.co/pkCwPJYCBx
For OA people - there's no surprises here. Large commercial publishers offer v. poor value http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK Nice to see it in PNAS tho
Is cost-per-citation a meaningful measure of value for a subscriber? http://t.co/d5uQFkOnsG
Is cost-per-citation a meaningful measure of value for a subscriber? http://t.co/d5uQFkOnsG
“@rmounce: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/bqqOkRcal3 more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Springer & co... #medlibs
Variation in costs of #academic #journal bundle deals between institutions and publishers - a USA perspective: http://t.co/54l4TeW04i
MT @scholarlykitchn Is cost-per-citation a meaningful measure of value? A: Not if you publish HSS journals http://t.co/dAUb5dErHv
No, but still a good metric RT @scholarlykitchn: Is cost-per-citation a meaningful measure of value for a subscriber? http://t.co/Wb06KBcTAs
Is cost-per-citation a meaningful measure of value for a subscriber? http://t.co/d5uQFkOnsG
NonProfit publishers offer lower prices than commercial houses with big deal journal bundles http://t.co/atrYcCTvhk HT @scholarlykitchn
Evaluating big deal journal bundles: NonProfit publishers offer lower prices than commercial houses http://t.co/d5uQFkOnsG
Is cost-per-citation a meaningful measure of value for a subscriber? http://t.co/d5uQFkOnsG
Evaluating big deal journal bundles: NonProfit publishers offer lower prices than commercial houses http://t.co/d5uQFkOnsG
Irony in publishing: "Evaluating big deal journal bundles" in PNAS. Wanna read it? Gotta pay. ;-) http://t.co/il5TyIaHXM
For OA people - there's no surprises here. Large commercial publishers offer v. poor value http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK Nice to see it in PNAS tho
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA
Important article re pricing for scholarly journals http://t.co/UYgcUTtrPO @tborchers @RandyCagle1 @Anne_Blackhurst @Michelle_Malott
The PNAS paper on journal bundle pricing is behind a paywall, but the accompanying data isn't: http://t.co/t5GB3ZpD48
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA
The PNAS paper on journal bundle pricing is behind a paywall, but the accompanying data isn't: http://t.co/t5GB3ZpD48
Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/sGHAwwwp7w
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA
Paper analyzing major sci publishers: "This information is of interest to economists who study monopolist pricing..." http://t.co/ym2lTef0Sm
This important investigation into journal bundling has been a long time in the making: http://t.co/6SEfcLZRqY
" tool publishers used to estimate a library’s willingness to pay history of the library’s spending on print subs "http://t.co/GNwL6srqSJ
Paper analyzing major sci publishers: "This information is of interest to economists who study monopolist pricing..." http://t.co/ym2lTef0Sm
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA
For OA people - there's no surprises here. Large commercial publishers offer v. poor value http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK Nice to see it in PNAS tho
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA
For OA people - there's no surprises here. Large commercial publishers offer v. poor value http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK Nice to see it in PNAS tho
MUST READ: Evaluating big deal journal bundles http://t.co/K3PeGG7wCK more proof showing poor value of Elsevier, Wiley, Springer & co... #OA