| Title |
Peer Reviewed: Defining Intake Fraction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Science & Technology, May 2002
|
| DOI | 10.1021/es0222770 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deborah H Bennett, Thomas E McKone, John S Evans, William W Nazaroff, Manuele D Margni, Olivier Jolliet, Kirk R Smith |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 15% |
| Canada | 2 | 7% |
| Colombia | 2 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Latvia | 1 | 4% |
| South Africa | 1 | 4% |
| Comoros | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 24% |
| Researcher | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 12% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 35% |
| Engineering | 8 | 16% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 13 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,470,768
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Science & Technology
#3,005
of 21,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,831
of 127,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Science & Technology
#81
of 2,140 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 21,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 127,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,140 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.