| Title |
Dynamics and associations of microbial community types across the human body
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nature13178 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tao Ding, Patrick D. Schloss |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 166 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 31% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 8% |
| Australia | 9 | 5% |
| Spain | 5 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 4 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| France | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 15 | 9% |
| Unknown | 58 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 84 | 51% |
| Scientists | 66 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,243 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 38 | 3% |
| Germany | 6 | <1% |
| Canada | 5 | <1% |
| Denmark | 5 | <1% |
| France | 4 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Russia | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 15 | 1% |
| Unknown | 1157 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 297 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 271 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 127 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 107 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 67 | 5% |
| Other | 200 | 16% |
| Unknown | 174 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 434 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 165 | 13% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 152 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 84 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 34 | 3% |
| Other | 154 | 12% |
| Unknown | 220 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 273. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#133,659
of 25,711,518 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#8,704
of 98,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#979
of 225,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#100
of 1,002 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 98,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,002 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.