↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Association Between Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Opioid Overdose-Related Deaths

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
policy
10 policy sources
twitter
101 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1277 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
632 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Association Between Opioid Prescribing Patterns and Opioid Overdose-Related Deaths
Published in
JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association, April 2011
DOI 10.1001/jama.2011.370
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amy S. B. Bohnert, Marcia Valenstein, Matthew J. Bair, Dara Ganoczy, John F. McCarthy, Mark A. Ilgen, Frederic C. Blow

Abstract

The rate of prescription opioid-related overdose death increased substantially in the United States over the past decade. Patterns of opioid prescribing may be related to risk of overdose mortality.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 101 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 632 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 12 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 617 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 92 15%
Student > Master 82 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 12%
Other 61 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 51 8%
Other 159 25%
Unknown 111 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 240 38%
Social Sciences 52 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 42 7%
Psychology 32 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 27 4%
Other 91 14%
Unknown 148 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 243. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2023.
All research outputs
#154,422
of 25,462,162 outputs
Outputs from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#2,301
of 36,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#434
of 120,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA: Journal of the American Medical Association
#5
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,462,162 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 36,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 72.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 120,703 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.