↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatrics, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 13,703)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
491 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
694 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Effective Messages in Vaccine Promotion: A Randomized Trial
Published in
Pediatrics, March 2014
DOI 10.1542/peds.2013-2365
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. Nyhan, J. Reifler, S. Richey, G. L. Freed

Abstract

To test the effectiveness of messages designed to reduce vaccine misperceptions and increase vaccination rates for measles-mumps-rubella (MMR).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 1,374 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 694 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 21 3%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Australia 3 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 655 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 141 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 136 20%
Researcher 91 13%
Student > Bachelor 86 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 42 6%
Other 141 20%
Unknown 57 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 153 22%
Social Sciences 125 18%
Psychology 92 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 53 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 41 6%
Other 134 19%
Unknown 96 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2123. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2020.
All research outputs
#1,455
of 15,879,709 outputs
Outputs from Pediatrics
#8
of 13,703 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14
of 190,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatrics
#1
of 148 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,879,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,703 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 190,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 148 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.