↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Early Diverging Fungi: Diversity and Impact at the Dawn of Terrestrial Life

Overview of attention for article published in Annual Review of Microbiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
40 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
Early Diverging Fungi: Diversity and Impact at the Dawn of Terrestrial Life
Published in
Annual Review of Microbiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1146/annurev-micro-030117-020324
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mary L Berbee, Timothy Y James, Christine Strullu-Derrien

Abstract

As decomposers or plant pathogens, fungi deploy invasive growth and powerful carbohydrate active enzymes to reduce multicellular plant tissues to humus and simple sugars. Fungi are perhaps also the most important mutualistic symbionts in modern ecosystems, transporting poorly soluble mineral nutrients to plants and thus enhancing the growth of vegetation. However, at their origin over a billion years ago, fungus-like plants and animals were unicellular marine microbes. Like the other multicellular kingdoms, Fungi evolved increased size, complexity, and metabolic functioning. Interactions of fungi with plants changed terrestrial ecology and geology and modified the Earth's atmosphere. In this review, we discuss the diversification and ecological roles of the fungi over their first 600 million years, from their origin through their colonization of land, drawing on phylogenomic evidence for their relationships and metabolic capabilities and on molecular dating, fossils, and modeling of Earth's paleoclimate. Expected final online publication date for the Annual Review of Microbiology Volume 71 is September 8, 2017. Please see http://www.annualreviews.org/page/journal/pubdates for revised estimates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 296 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 60 20%
Researcher 44 15%
Student > Master 34 11%
Student > Bachelor 33 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 5%
Other 36 12%
Unknown 75 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 58 20%
Environmental Science 24 8%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 1%
Other 16 5%
Unknown 85 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,510,003
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Microbiology
#86
of 1,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,927
of 326,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Microbiology
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,293 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.