↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
40 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1052 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
984 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document
Published in
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.04.026
Pubmed ID
Authors

David S. Riley, Melissa S. Barber, Gunver S. Kienle, Jeffrey K. Aronson, Tido von Schoen-Angerer, Peter Tugwell, Helmut Kiene, Mark Helfand, Douglas G. Altman, Harold Sox, Paul G. Werthmann, David Moher, Richard A. Rison, Larissa Shamseer, Christian A. Koch, Gordon H. Sun, Patrick Hanaway, Nancy L. Sudak, Marietta Kaszkin-Bettag, James E. Carpenter, Joel J. Gagnier

Abstract

Well-written and transparent case reports (1) reveal early signals of potential benefits, harms, and information on the use of resources; (2) provide information for clinical research and clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), and (3) inform medical education. High-quality case reports are more likely when authors follow reporting guidelines. During 2011-2012 a group of clinicians, researchers, and journal editors developed recommendations for the accurate reporting of information in case reports that resulted in the CARE (CAse REport) Statement and Checklist. They were presented at the 2013 International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication, have been endorsed by multiple medical journals, and translated into nine languages. This explanation and elaboration document has the objective to increase the use and dissemination of the CARE Checklist in writing and publishing case reports. Each item from the CARE Checklist is explained and accompanied by published examples. The explanations and examples in this document are designed to support the writing of high-quality case reports by authors and their critical appraisal by editors, peer reviewers, and readers. This article and the 2013 CARE Statement and Checklist, available from the CARE website [www.care-statement.org] and the EQUATOR Network, [www.equator-network.org] are resources for improving the completeness and transparency of case reports.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 40 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 984 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 984 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 126 13%
Student > Master 113 11%
Researcher 94 10%
Other 77 8%
Student > Postgraduate 72 7%
Other 189 19%
Unknown 313 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 362 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 117 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 2%
Neuroscience 18 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 2%
Other 101 10%
Unknown 353 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2024.
All research outputs
#948,610
of 25,880,422 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#248
of 4,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,952
of 329,724 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
#6
of 68 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,873 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,724 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 68 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.