↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

The roots of human altruism

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Psychology, May 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#11 of 984)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
48 news outlets
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
463 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
704 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
The roots of human altruism
Published in
British Journal of Psychology, May 2011
DOI 10.1348/000712608x379061
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felix Warneken, Michael Tomasello

Abstract

Human infants as young as 14 to 18 months of age help others attain their goals, for example, by helping them to fetch out-of-reach objects or opening cabinets for them. They do this irrespective of any reward from adults (indeed external rewards undermine the tendency), and very likely with no concern for such things as reciprocation and reputation, which serve to maintain altruism in older children and adults. Humans' nearest primate relatives, chimpanzees, also help others instrumentally without concrete rewards. These results suggest that human infants are naturally altruistic, and as ontogeny proceeds and they must deal more independently with a wider range of social contexts, socialization and feedback from social interactions with others become important mediators of these initial altruistic tendencies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 704 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 10 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 7 <1%
Unknown 670 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 148 21%
Student > Bachelor 142 20%
Student > Master 87 12%
Researcher 56 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 44 6%
Other 116 16%
Unknown 111 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 343 49%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 7%
Social Sciences 51 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 30 4%
Neuroscience 16 2%
Other 84 12%
Unknown 129 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 390. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2021.
All research outputs
#74,348
of 24,627,841 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Psychology
#11
of 984 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#177
of 114,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Psychology
#2
of 235 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,627,841 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 984 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 235 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.