↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

The system of care for the diabetic foot: objectives, outcomes, and opportunities

Overview of attention for article published in Diabetic Foot & Ankle, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
49 tweeters
facebook
7 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
The system of care for the diabetic foot: objectives, outcomes, and opportunities
Published in
Diabetic Foot & Ankle, October 2013
DOI 10.3402/dfa.v4i0.21847
Pubmed ID
Authors

Neal R. Barshes, Meena Sigireddi, James S. Wrobel, Archana Mahankali, Jeffrey M. Robbins, Panos Kougias, David G. Armstrong

Abstract

Most cases of lower extremity limb loss in the United States occur among people with diabetes who have a diabetic foot ulcer (DFU). These DFUs and the associated limb loss that may occur lead to excess healthcare costs and have a large negative impact on mobility, psychosocial well-being, and quality of life. The strategies for DFU prevention and management are evolving, but the implementation of these prevention and management strategies remains challenging. Barriers to implementation include poor access to primary medical care; patient beliefs and lack of adherence to medical advice; delays in DFU recognition; limited healthcare resources and practice heterogeneity of specialists. Herein, we review the contemporary outcomes of DFU prevention and management to provide a framework for prioritizing quality improvement efforts within a resource-limited healthcare environment.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 150 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 18%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Postgraduate 19 12%
Other 13 8%
Other 40 26%
Unknown 11 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 71 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 24 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 6%
Engineering 7 5%
Arts and Humanities 4 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 21 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 159. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2019.
All research outputs
#94,553
of 13,976,935 outputs
Outputs from Diabetic Foot & Ankle
#1
of 91 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,201
of 167,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Diabetic Foot & Ankle
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,976,935 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them