↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 15,060)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
107 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
53 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1493 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1801 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2017 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Published in
Circulation, January 2017
DOI 10.1161/cir.0000000000000485
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emelia J. Benjamin, Michael J. Blaha, Stephanie E. Chiuve, Mary Cushman, Sandeep R. Das, Rajat Deo, Sarah D. de Ferranti, James Floyd, Myriam Fornage, Cathleen Gillespie, Carmen R. Isasi, Monik C. Jiménez, Lori Chaffin Jordan, Suzanne E. Judd, Daniel Lackland, Judith H. Lichtman, Lynda Lisabeth, Simin Liu, Chris T. Longenecker, Rachel H. Mackey, Kunihiro Matsushita, Dariush Mozaffarian, Michael E. Mussolino, Khurram Nasir, Robert W. Neumar, Latha Palaniappan, Dilip K. Pandey, Ravi R. Thiagarajan, Mathew J. Reeves, Matthew Ritchey, Carlos J. Rodriguez, Gregory A. Roth, Wayne D. Rosamond, Comilla Sasson, Amytis Towfighi, Connie W. Tsao, Melanie B. Turner, Salim S. Virani, Jenifer H. Voeks, Joshua Z. Willey, John T. Wilkins, Jason HY. Wu, Heather M. Alger, Sally S. Wong, Paul Muntner, On behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee, Emelia J.Benjamin, Michael J.Blaha, Stephanie E.Chiuve, MaryCushman, Sandeep R.Das, RajatDeo, Sarah D.de Ferranti, JamesFloyd, MyriamFornage, CathleenGillespie, Carmen R.Isasi, Monik C.Jiménez, Lori ChaffinJordan, Suzanne E.Judd, DanielLackland, Judith H.Lichtman, LyndaLisabeth, SiminLiu, Chris T.Longenecker, Rachel H.Mackey, KunihiroMatsushita, DariushMozaffarian, Michael E.Mussolino, KhurramNasir, Robert W.Neumar, LathaPalaniappan, Dilip K.Pandey, Ravi R.Thiagarajan, Mathew J.Reeves, MatthewRitchey, Carlos J.Rodriguez, Gregory A.Roth, Wayne D.Rosamond, ComillaSasson, AmytisTowfighi, Connie W.Tsao, Melanie B.Turner, Salim S.Virani, Jenifer H.Voeks, Joshua Z.Willey, John T.Wilkins, Jason HY.Wu, Heather M.Alger, Sally S.Wong, PaulMuntner, WRITING GROUP MEMBERS

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,801 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 1792 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 320 18%
Student > Master 316 18%
Student > Bachelor 282 16%
Researcher 208 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 168 9%
Other 507 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 565 31%
Unspecified 267 15%
Engineering 229 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 162 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 145 8%
Other 433 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 876. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2018.
All research outputs
#3,719
of 11,598,187 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#14
of 15,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298
of 324,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#2
of 221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,598,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,060 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 324,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.