RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @CoronaHeadsUp: Likely a response to this recent paper: Deep immunological imprinting due to the ancestral spike in the current bivalen…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @TM_Quencher: 起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度…
RT @BagaiDr: Deep immunological imprinting due to ancestral spike in current bivalent COVID19 vac: Ab resp from who had 3vax monovalent mRN…
起源株の抗原を4回以上繰り返し接種することで血液中の中和抗体に関しては免疫刷り込みの影響が見られるとの報告があります。 一方でリアルワールドの観察研究では、これまでのところ単価と2価の効果の差はそれほど大きくはなく、免疫刷り込みが実際にどの程度臨床的に影響するかは不明です。
RT @BagaiDr: Deep immunological imprinting due to ancestral spike in current bivalent COVID19 vac: Ab resp from who had 3vax monovalent mRN…
RT @BagaiDr: Deep immunological imprinting due to ancestral spike in current bivalent COVID19 vac: Ab resp from who had 3vax monovalent mRN…
@DoeSpam Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der angestammte Anstieg des aktuellen bivalenten COVID-19-Impfstoffs die Ursache für eine tiefe immunologische Prägung ist. Es wird daher dringend empfohlen,es aus künftigen Impfstoffzusammensetzungen zu
Deep immunological imprinting due to ancestral spike in current bivalent COVID19 vac: Ab resp from who had 3vax monovalent mRNA follow by either bivalent or monovalent booster,or who had BTI with BA.5 or BQ subvariant after vac with original monovalent vac
Likely a response to this recent paper: Deep immunological imprinting due to the ancestral spike in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine https://t.co/GGZchLv2LW https://t.co/fk3599sNxz
6/ "and immune imprinting due to repeated exposure to the index virus may reduce immune responses to new target antigen(s)." We saw this recently in a preprint from Ho et al https://t.co/tWj8bczupM
@phillychilly2 @celtics3444 @hutchleah The problem with vaccines in their current state is that they are outdated & non-sterilizing. We are still vaxxing for 2019/20 versions of the virus (even the latest vax includes these old strains) which can reduc
@fuulu_zh Und wenn man jetzt beide gemeinsam hernimmt ist da auch ein gewisser Widerspruch ( bzgl möglichen imprinting durch WT Anteil) 2/ https://t.co/G0rU3yiHyb
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @NormalBirthBRAZ: Surgem evidências de que colocar proteína spike de 2019 nas vacinas COVID de 2023 foi um erro grave. Pré-prints deixan…
RT @michaelmina_lab: The pre print linked above and again here says it well! “We… show that the ancestral spike exacerbates immunological…
@T_Brautigan Preprint: https://t.co/Q5Z5qQOEls If this is really one of the only major differences, which Japan's inoculation rates have been crazy good for so long, then I am believing the recommendation to remove the WT component from future vaccine com
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @stewak2: Maybe the idea of endless boosting isn’t great, either? Actual post vaccination infection with current circulating variant mig…
RT @DonEford: Turns out the Bivalent isn't just a gimmick It's a bad vaccine. "the ancestral spike in the current bivalent COVID-19 vacc…
@macroliter So trying to navigate the booster. This paper says bivalent booster can cause imprinting (bc wildtype WT included) https://t.co/NbD6MYRohf As does this one: https://t.co/1m5DFyg2bg Trying to understand why bivalent is the thing to do, rather
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
Dr Mina and Dr David Ho(senior author of this paper) have become part of a group of ‘touchstones’ I look to for difficult Q’s like this. VRBPAC to discuss strain compositions for the Fall is on June 15.
@Michael59503746 @nohomelikeplace This is for mRNA - but do NOT want bivalent! ancestral spike in current bivalent vaccine is cause of deep immunological imprinting. Its removal from future vaccine compositions is strongly recommended. https://t.co/CWcoY
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
@johnbruso @EricTopol inclusion of ancestral spike prevents broadening of antibodies to BA.5 component in bivalent vaccine, defeating intended goal. ancestral spike is cause of deep immunological imprinting. removal from future vaccine compositions is st
Deep immunological imprinting due to the ancestral spike in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine https://t.co/jFAMx7CqH8
RT @BagaiDr: Deep immunological imprinting due to ancestral spike in current bivalent COVID19 vac: Compared to monovalent booster, bivalent…
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @RajeevJayadevan: Columbia University study shows bivalent booster offers no advantage over original version The latest versions of Omi…
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
RT @TwHandle: @YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
@YouAreLobbyLud Bivalent is ineffective against XBB variants. As others have noted, Novavax appears to be the best option.
@YouAreLobbyLud Or potentially none right now. https://t.co/JcGxGBfzL3 https://t.co/K1nICls94Q
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @dfocosi: ‼️@yunlong_cao & @ColumbiaMed suggest wild-type Spike vaccines have become detrimental. Time to replace it with BA.2.* (given…
RT @michaelmina_lab: The pre print linked above and again here says it well! “We… show that the ancestral spike exacerbates immunological…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @rehanahbhathal: @ngchowsoon @melatinungsari @azrulmohdkhalib This is the original study
@ngchowsoon @melatinungsari @azrulmohdkhalib This is the original study
@masanpra Súmese la "impronta inmune profunda" que causa la infección #Covid19 https://t.co/UFTw3r1ODj
RT @CorneliaBeeking: „Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der angestammte Spike im aktuellen bivalenten COVID-19-Impfstoff die Ursach…
@amcalber @DrLejarazu Porque es falso (mentira) que la protección de las vacunas contra, p. ej. Wu-hu-1, sea "de por vida". Es eficaz durante unos 6-8 meses. Y no conviene vacunar con Spike de esa cepa como protección contra los Omicrons actuales, debido a
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT @dfocosi: ‼️@yunlong_cao & @ColumbiaMed suggest wild-type Spike vaccines have become detrimental. Time to replace it with BA.2.* (given…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @michaelmina_lab: The pre print linked above and again here says it well! “We… show that the ancestral spike exacerbates immunological…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @dfocosi: ‼️@yunlong_cao & @ColumbiaMed suggest wild-type Spike vaccines have become detrimental. Time to replace it with BA.2.* (given…
RT @dfocosi: ‼️@yunlong_cao & @ColumbiaMed suggest wild-type Spike vaccines have become detrimental. Time to replace it with BA.2.* (given…
RT @pelagicbird: "Our findings suggest that the ancestral spike in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine is the cause of deep immunological…
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT betzhallo https://t.co/67GD5jGxNY "RT michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…"
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
Resultaten suggereren dat voorouderlijke afstamming de oorzaak is van immunologische imprinting in het huidige bivalente Covid-19 vaccin. De verwijdering ervan uit toekomstige vaccins wordt daarom sterk aanbevolen. https://t.co/zJs9nGk07c
This is why I stopped recommending my parents to get their 4th Covid booster shot.
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT @RajeevJayadevan: Columbia University study shows bivalent booster offers no advantage over original version The latest versions of Omi…
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT @RajeevJayadevan: Columbia University study shows bivalent booster offers no advantage over original version The latest versions of Omi…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @RajeevJayadevan: Columbia University study shows bivalent booster offers no advantage over original version The latest versions of Omi…
RT @RajeevJayadevan: Columbia University study shows bivalent booster offers no advantage over original version The latest versions of Omi…
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
🤖 Tweet rising in popularity within Science Pulse database [2/3] https://t.co/bWFwcWeD1z
RT @michaelmina_lab: The pre print linked above and again here says it well! “We… show that the ancestral spike exacerbates immunological…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
Vacunarse con Abdala o Patria como refuerzo contra COVID, las cuales no incluyen como antígenos a las nuevas variantes de la proteína spike del virus, no solamente no dará inmunidad contra estas variantes, sino que puede ser contraproducente.
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…
RT @ejustin46: Deep immunological IMPRINTING due to the ancestral SPIKE in the current bivalent COVID-19 vaccine 😨 https://t.co/05Ykf5qLu8…
RT @RWittenbrink: ➡️ Unsere Ergebnisse deuten darauf hin, dass der Ahnenstamm im derzeitigen bivalenten #COVID19-Impfstoff die Ursache für…
RT @michaelmina_lab: Ancestral spike should be removed from the vaccine Potential for “antigenic seniority” to blunt new immunity by focus…