Evolving Management Practices for Early Sepsis-induced Hypoperfusion: A Narrative Review
American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine, May 2023
Elizabeth S. Munroe, Robert C. Hyzy, Matthew W. Semler, Manu Shankar-Hari, Paul J. Young, Fernando G. Zampieri, Hallie C. Prescott
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 118 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of||2||2%|
|Members of the public||104||88%|
|Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals)||5||4%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||2||2%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||2||20%|
|Student > Bachelor||1||10%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Medicine and Dentistry||5||50%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 73. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2023.
All research outputs
of 24,500,598 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
of 10,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 372,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Respiratory & Critical Care Medicine
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,500,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,866 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.