@tempyy @thecvaofficial @OntarioGovt @davidclemnt “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternative
@TheGGTC “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
@Vaping_Industry and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
RT @BeztabakasPA: 💥 🔍 PĒTĪJUMS: "Tradicionālo cigarešu alternatīvu regulējumam būtu jābūt proporcionālam to relatīvajiem riskiem, lai trad…
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @Sharon_ACox: Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of…
RT @Sharon_ACox: Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of…
RT @Sharon_ACox: Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of…
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @Sharon_ACox: Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of…
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @RushmoreExt23: Full paper below: https://t.co/wIq79jpahG
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
RT @RushmoreExt23: Full paper below: https://t.co/wIq79jpahG
RT @RushmoreExt23: “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing…
Full paper below: https://t.co/wIq79jpahG
“Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing or even reversing recent declines in smoking, especially among youth and young adults.”
Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of Competition. https://t.co/XmAHr77KUj
RT @Sharon_ACox: Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of…
RT @Sharon_ACox: Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of…
💥 🔍 PĒTĪJUMS: "Tradicionālo cigarešu alternatīvu regulējumam būtu jābūt proporcionālam to relatīvajiem riskiem, lai tradicionālo cigarešu smēķētāji būtu motivēti pāriet no dedzināmiem produktiem uz drošākām [mazāk kaitīgām] alternatīvām" https://t.co/6K2
RT @Sharon_ACox: Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of…
Fascinating points made here 👇🏼 Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of Competition https://t.co/474w9ZmpEw
@amapresident nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
RT @benoit_durand: Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to con…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @FalkenVape: Très intéressant article (centré sur les US, la part de marché en Europe et surtout en France est bien différente). On "voi…
RT @benoit_durand: Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to con…
RT @benoit_durand: Les mesures réglementaires contre la vape, et autres produits à risques réduits font les affaires des cigarettiers et le…
RT @benoit_durand: Les mesures réglementaires contre la vape, et autres produits à risques réduits font les affaires des cigarettiers et le…
RT @benoit_durand: Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to con…
RT @FalkenVape: Très intéressant article (centré sur les US, la part de marché en Europe et surtout en France est bien différente). On "voi…
RT @benoit_durand: Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to con…
RT @benoit_durand: Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to con…
RT @benoit_durand: Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to con…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @FalkenVape: Très intéressant article (centré sur les US, la part de marché en Europe et surtout en France est bien différente). On "voi…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @FalkenVape: Très intéressant article (centré sur les US, la part de marché en Europe et surtout en France est bien différente). On "voi…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @FalkenVape: Très intéressant article (centré sur les US, la part de marché en Europe et surtout en France est bien différente). On "voi…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @benoit_durand: Les mesures réglementaires contre la vape, et autres produits à risques réduits font les affaires des cigarettiers et le…
RT @benoit_durand: Les mesures réglementaires contre la vape, et autres produits à risques réduits font les affaires des cigarettiers et le…
RT @benoit_durand: Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to con…
RT @FalkenVape: Très intéressant article (centré sur les US, la part de marché en Europe et surtout en France est bien différente). On "voi…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
@KulikovUNIATF @ParentsvsVape @ElizaWallace27 @HealthyKidsCC @dkingpower7 @VietnamNewsVNS @WHOVietnam @UNDPVietNam @uninvietnam @FCTCofficial When we tell you that the #WHO and its #CFTC protect the tobacco industry 🚬 https://t.co/O2oyQvvC9l https://t.co/B
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
Regulatory measures against vaping, and other reduced-risk products, benefit tobacco companies and encourage them to continue to slow down or feign a transition away from cigarettes. Let it be clear: anti-vapes are objectively the allies of tobacco https:/
Les mesures réglementaires contre la vape, et autres produits à risques réduits font les affaires des cigarettiers et les encouragent à continuer de freiner ou feindre une transition hors des cigarettes. Les antivapes sont objectivement les alliés du tabac
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
Très intéressant article (centré sur les US, la part de marché en Europe et surtout en France est bien différente). On "voit" littéralement l'effet des taxes sur les produits du vapotage, de l'interdiction des arômes puis de l'interdiction des produits ind
@FMPasquini @lauzzanamichel @ACT_SansTabac @surfriderfrance @TI_France @Dr_moji Les mesures réglementaires contre la vape, et autres produits à risques réduits font les affaires des cigarettiers et les encouragent à continuer de freiner ou feindre une tran
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
RT @VapolitiqueCH: Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access…
Lutte antitabac, vape et économie : l'article à lire absolument dans le n° de ce mois de @NTR_Journal et en open access en ligne : Do Tobacco Companies Have an Incentive to Promote “Harm Reduction” Products?: The Role of Competition, by D. Levy et al. >
@drkellyhenning @CTFKGlobal @guardian “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://
RT @grove_mitchell: @Mark_Butler_MP “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to…
RT @PantherNoster: "Die Regulierung von nicht brennbaren Nikotinabgabeprodukten und Zigaretten sollte in einem Verhältnis zu ihren relative…
RT @PantherNoster: "Die Regulierung von nicht brennbaren Nikotinabgabeprodukten und Zigaretten sollte in einem Verhältnis zu ihren relative…
RT @PantherNoster: "Die Regulierung von nicht brennbaren Nikotinabgabeprodukten und Zigaretten sollte in einem Verhältnis zu ihren relative…
RT @grove_mitchell: @Mark_Butler_MP “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to…
RT @PantherNoster: "Die Regulierung von nicht brennbaren Nikotinabgabeprodukten und Zigaretten sollte in einem Verhältnis zu ihren relative…
RT @PantherNoster: "Die Regulierung von nicht brennbaren Nikotinabgabeprodukten und Zigaretten sollte in einem Verhältnis zu ihren relative…
RT @PantherNoster: "Die Regulierung von nicht brennbaren Nikotinabgabeprodukten und Zigaretten sollte in einem Verhältnis zu ihren relative…
"Die Regulierung von nicht brennbaren Nikotinabgabeprodukten und Zigaretten sollte in einem Verhältnis zu ihren relativen Risiken stehen, damit Raucher Anreize haben, von brennbaren zu sichereren Alternativen zu wechseln".
RT @grove_mitchell: @Mark_Butler_MP “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to…
RT @grove_mitchell: @Mark_Butler_MP “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to…
RT @grove_mitchell: @Mark_Butler_MP “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to…
@Mark_Butler_MP “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
@FDATobacco “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
RT @grove_mitchell: @psychheals “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to the…
@psychheals “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
@FDATobacco @HHSGov “Regulations that limit competition from independent firms while also protecting cigarette company profits risk slowing or even reversing recent declines in smoking, especially among youth and young adults.” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
@katherineefoley Far from achieving a benefit to public health, the FDA has an active hand in the deaths of its smoking populace through either blatant misinformation or failure to convey the HUGE disparity in harm between smoking and vaping. https://t.c
RT @grove_mitchell: @truthinitiative “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate t…
@truthinitiative “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
@WHOWPRO “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
RT @grove_mitchell: @Rakesh60Mahajan “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate t…
RT @grove_mitchell: @Rakesh60Mahajan “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate t…
@Rakesh60Mahajan “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
RT @grove_mitchell: @CDCTobaccoFree @CDCMMWR cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to…
RT @grove_mitchell: @LungAssociation @CDCgov @FDATobacco “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes shoul…
@LungAssociation @CDCgov @FDATobacco “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t
RT @grove_mitchell: @CDCTobaccoFree @CDCMMWR cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to…
@CDCTobaccoFree @CDCMMWR cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternatives” https://t.co/tSgUNeywZK
@truthinitiative @LizSzabo @KFFHealthNews @NBCNews “The regulation of non-combustible nicotine delivery products and cigarettes should be proportionate to their relative risks, so that smokers have incentives to switch from combustibles to safer alternativ
RT @cdoug: @aaronsibarium @elonmusk We published this peer-reviewed paper in January, which I and colleagues would be very happy to discuss…
RT @cdoug: @aaronsibarium @elonmusk We published this peer-reviewed paper in January, which I and colleagues would be very happy to discuss…
RT @cdoug: @aaronsibarium @elonmusk We published this peer-reviewed paper in January, which I and colleagues would be very happy to discuss…
RT @cdoug: @aaronsibarium @elonmusk We published this peer-reviewed paper in January, which I and colleagues would be very happy to discuss…