"Our findings, .. speculation that the imprinting of SARS-CoV-2 immunity by vaccination may lead to the development of original antigenic sin if ...." https://t.co/bnH6CZ1RMF 😂2 years later lol https://t.co/8aFgTwrnkP ⏬& https://t.co/vuENjL8gBp ⏬ htt
Oui le booster est efficace 🤣variant specific boosters fail to elicit variant specific response : https://t.co/8aFgTwrnkP there was no novel response from variant specific boosters in primates and now we see the same in humans : https://t.co/vuENjL8gBp htt
@GANyborg @EricTopol @Folkehelseinst The same authors published this in Oct 2022. Later, we found little to no T-cell boost, and that's the vax that caused an autoimmune response for me. It seems they published at key times to promote vaccine uptake.
去年からデータは出揃ってるし、多分従来型追加接種とXBB対応単価もそこまで中和活性は数値として差が出ないんじゃない? とは思います。
RT @michaelzlin: My brief take on the today's paper showing BA5 bivalent similar to original booster in inducing nAbs: Not great news Not t…
@AlexBerenson People do not want to understand the concept of immune imprinting. Updated jabs cause the body to produce a reaction that is tailored to the original jab response from two years ago. The current (or in this case extinct) variant? Not so mu
RT @yozo_oba: まあ、忽那さんも何かしらの知見を基に発信されてますから 出来ればもっと情報の上流の方で『そんな事ないもん!!抗原原罪は古い知識!!』って言ってもらえるとなお良いですね⭕️ https://t.co/u8kPMsjh4n
RT @yozo_oba: まあ、忽那さんも何かしらの知見を基に発信されてますから 出来ればもっと情報の上流の方で『そんな事ないもん!!抗原原罪は古い知識!!』って言ってもらえるとなお良いですね⭕️ https://t.co/u8kPMsjh4n
まあ、忽那さんも何かしらの知見を基に発信されてますから 出来ればもっと情報の上流の方で『そんな事ないもん!!抗原原罪は古い知識!!』って言ってもらえるとなお良いですね⭕️ https://t.co/u8kPMsjh4n
RT @_JDecker: So to summarise it looks like we may need a booster for our booster booster.
@RLMorales123 @EmpireStateBldg @iHeartRadio 8) kind of important… https://t.co/s7FDrHwdNj
vaccine against all SARS-CoV-2 variants tested, including BA.4/BA.5. https://t.co/vuENjL8gBp confirming in human what they found with macaques when variant specific boosters fail to elicit variant specific response https://t.co/8aFgTwrnkP https://t.co/4ztd
@kazuhid53668102 @suudayoooooo @CORONAnoHIMITSU ちなみにですけど、母集団に対して何人という観点も、前提となる作用機序の面を無視すると間違ってた場合取ってきた統計もソレを切り口に語られたストーリーも毎度有耶無耶になってしまうとは思いますが、ワクチン接種によってどのように死者を減らし保護的に働いてたと推察されますか?
@BouchraAwake Sur combien de souris vont-ils le tester cette fois-ci?https://t.co/UgkYRQExVN
@margelafleur J'espère que le prochain booster aura été testé sur plus que 8 souris.https://t.co/FuOyiz8qkg
RT @juli_bg_bs: "At ~3-5 weeks post bivalent mRNA vaccine targeting BA.4/BA.5 had similar neutralizing antibody titers as those receiving a…
RT @danaparish: Sadly, can’t rely on our PH officials for reality. Thx, @EricTopol 👇🏼. “Boosters will not have a substantial or durable i…
RT @blanc0981: 悲報 市場でのBA.5二価ワクチンの人体実験の結果発表 従来の武漢株用ワクチンより優れた BA.5 に対する中和抗体応答はありません。 この発見は、免疫学的刷り込み(抗原原罪)を示している可能性があります。 結論:現時点では二価ワクチンは、従…
@blanc0981 これでしたっけ https://t.co/Fw3Gs5L1jf
9/ The new vaccine is not meeting expectations. https://t.co/XIuLcRpby0 The effectiveness of the Vax diminishes after 150 days. https://t.co/dr27DZIZ4Q The mouse booster has been found to be ineffective. https://t.co/nm4yBcWWNc
RT @Agiewillow: Cessak robi z ludzi idiotów załączając nierecenzowany artykuł pisany... przez pracowników Pfizera. To jest tak żałosne, że…
@HalucoJK1 やはり全く理解してないですね。 ブースター前とブースター後の中和抗体価の違いではなく、WT用の4thショットと二価ワクによる4thショットに違いがない、という話ですよ。 つまり同じ。効くわけないんですよ。 https://t.co/RPCACMCPoM
C'est l'étude que recherchais. Contrairement au booster https://t.co/8aFgTwrnkP & https://t.co/vuENjL8gBp "L'infection antérieure à l'omicron peut avoir élargi la réponse immunitaire contre un futur défi de réinfection." https://t.co/NNKdOQw0mr
RT @virologie_sfm: Le récit critique d'une vaccination cliniquement efficace mais immunologiquement complexe ! Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines —…
Le récit critique d'une vaccination cliniquement efficace mais immunologiquement complexe ! Bivalent Covid-19 Vaccines — A Cautionary Tale | https://t.co/F76Vjjh6lC (figure de https://t.co/BGzfi8rO0a) https://t.co/iHPnDYmxm9
@jon_ostrove @IanCopeland5 @EricTopol @ScottGottliebMD Heres the study that Topol sited: https://t.co/7ssvN0uUCt
"These findings may be indicative of immunological imprinting, although follow-up studies are needed to determine.." https://t.co/vuENjL8OqX "Therefore, an Omicron boost may not provide greater immunity or protection ...current mRNA-1273 vaccine." https://
@ghastlydoctor @EricTopol Here's another thread similar to this one by @EricTopol: https://t.co/XU4EHtnODj Have feedback on the relevance of this similar thread? Let us know in the replies!
RT @danaparish: Sadly, can’t rely on our PH officials for reality. Thx, @EricTopol 👇🏼. “Boosters will not have a substantial or durable i…
RT @EricTopol: New on the bivalent BA.5 vaccine booster immune response in people No better neutralizing antibody response to BA.5 than the…
RT @wanderer_jasnah: at 3-5 weeks you're mostly just going to see early differentiation of MBCs to plasma cells w/o much SHM first, both in…
RT @wanderer_jasnah: at 3-5 weeks you're mostly just going to see early differentiation of MBCs to plasma cells w/o much SHM first, both in…
The vaccines certainly boost antibody levels, but the antibodies produced are not Omicron specific and are unlikely to offer significantly increased protection against Omicron infection. 5/ https://t.co/5zMhLfoS7e
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 11/ Aktuelle Ergebnisse zum adaptierten BA.4/5-Vakzin bestätigen, dass das Vorgehen der #EMA und die rechtliche Grundlag…
RT @Quo_vadis_BRD: 11/ Aktuelle Ergebnisse zum adaptierten BA.4/5-Vakzin bestätigen, dass das Vorgehen der #EMA und die rechtliche Grundlag…
@buddman4 @MindsTerminus @healthbyjames "A fourth dose, a bivalent mRNA vaccine targeting Omicron BA.4/BA.5 and an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain did not induce superior neutralizing antibody responses in humans, at the time period tested, compared to the ori
@Nomoretrust8 @stkirsch "A fourth dose, a bivalent mRNA vaccine targeting Omicron BA.4/BA.5 and an ancestral SARS-CoV-2 strain did not induce superior neutralizing antibody responses in humans, at the time period tested, compared to the original monovalent
@JSSciencefocus @Noisynanawarat1 @AlboMP Have not seen a paper on the BA1 bivalent that we have (but do not have BA1), but numerous on BA4/5 that is being used elsewhere. Positive outcomes. But not against XBB (note caveats), hope it helps: https://t.co/3
@AntibioticDoc @checkupcbc @ianhanomansing Dr. Saxinger, I'm 4 dosed (incld Bivalent vaccine) + 1 infection (it still sucked but when it happened after 3 yrs, I think that is just life). Have you seen this #bioRxiv preprint? I first heard Dr. Paul Offit me
@ghastlydoctor @TWenseleers @BallouxFrancois Here's another thread similar to this one by @EricTopol: https://t.co/XU4EHtnODj Have feedback on the relevance of this similar thread? Let us know in the replies!
@KlaasvanDijk5 @arvai_i @Cyclad01 @cisrits @JohnDoomen1 @detleflg @ThomasInLeiden @rivm @vanranstmarc @BorgerPieter @PostvanFenna @Marc_Veld Toch ook dit gelezen https://t.co/obhicimxTl dat wel degelijk de resultaten met het bivalente BA.5 vaccin betere re
RT @jukka235: @JukkaPerttula @myllarni Se tutkimus näyttäisi olevan tämä. Mutta ... 1/2 https://t.co/Hi023S6tTj
@JukkaPerttula @myllarni Se tutkimus näyttäisi olevan tämä. Mutta ... 1/2 https://t.co/Hi023S6tTj
@Goldmoney New study once again shows that the new bivalent booster is no more effective than the old boosters, which are not that effective either. https://t.co/H1sAk5NORL
@FaheemYounus omi-boosters do not confer new immune response. 66 authors many from NIH and NIAID https://t.co/8aFgTwrnkP Booster not produce more or better neutralizing antibody titers than the old vaccine https://t.co/vuENjL8gBp "These findings may be i
A thread on why those early studies couldn't say the BA5+Wuhan bivalent was better than another Wuhan booster: the expected benefit is actually there, but N was too small to establish 95% statistical certainty. That is, studies were underpowered. https://t
@konold @ProfGThurston @taipan168 See actual data: https://t.co/Fod8PDbrdx
@MathieuMolimard @anticon81179974 @Sante_Gouv Le booster ? lol le booster omi ne confèrent pas une nouvelle réponse immunitaire. https://t.co/vuENjL8OqX & https://t.co/8aFgTwrVan (66 chercheurs NIH et NIAID) https://t.co/ItyX4xuxTF
RT @yozo_oba: @a_kruschke @024masamasa @sosotakei Antibody responses to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine booster shot https://t.co/7…
RT @yozo_oba: @a_kruschke @024masamasa @sosotakei Antibody responses to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine booster shot https://t.co/7…
RT @yozo_oba: @a_kruschke @024masamasa @sosotakei Antibody responses to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine booster shot https://t.co/7…
@a_kruschke @024masamasa @sosotakei Antibody responses to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine booster shot https://t.co/7kyLPlEwQc よろしくお願いします。
Aquí la cita (2/) Antibody responses to Omicron BA.4/BA.5 bivalent mRNA vaccine booster shot | bioRxiv https://t.co/z7FpcGUc4Z
no no, It was fully expected coz leaky vaccines. Vaccines, including boosters are showing strong negative efficacy vs omicron this is consistent with omicron being as OAS enabled escape variant. Thank you you r welcome lol https://t.co/vuENjKQFcP & htt
RT @EricTopol: New on the bivalent BA.5 vaccine booster immune response in people No better neutralizing antibody response to BA.5 than the…
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @DrJBhattacharya: Two new pre-prints (Columbia U & Beth Israel Deaconess) show no additional neutralizing antibody levels from the BA4/5…
@AbbeyScott16 @otepofficial https://t.co/LIhe14GOa1 https://t.co/cSSPa0QLV2 https://t.co/qLXDo4cF1T I somehow doubt the vaccines you are talking about are doing this. Not that that was my point. Convince people that something is right, they'll do anythi
Source https://t.co/7NuRKZgqKJ Note: still undergoing peer review, 👀 this space. Also note antibody titres don't give a full picture of how well the antibody responds to a virus IRL. I do like the study design in that it compares freshly boosted Mono vs
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
@CDCgov Here is some data on this garbage bivalent "MouseBooster" vaccine doesn't work https://t.co/GojJcfQWiD https://t.co/Dl7vwvss4c may be worse than not working (immune imprinting) https://t.co/e8MHLyUHlV has side effects Is it worth taking your ch
@GovCanHealth https://t.co/av4hGNz7OT Back boosting, cool.
RT @mph_for_doctors: 議論を呼ぶ未査読論文です。 「3回従来ワクチンを接種後にBA.4/5対応の2価ワクチンを接種した人」vs「4回従来ワクチンを接種した人」で『BA.4/5に対する抗体価』を比較したところ、両者に差はないという結果でした。 BA.4/5…
@DrAlfredoTorre1 @DrSalinasLab @HLGatell @SSalud_mx Y de hecho, ahora comparando booster bivalente VS vacuna "original" en acción contra BA.5 (el linaje predominante actual en México, pero desplazado por las ya mencionadas), también resultan un fracaso: h
L'administration d'un nouveau vaccin bivalent n'a pas suscité de réponses en anticorps neutralisant le virus nettement supérieures à celles obtenues avec un vaccin monovalent original. Ces résultats pourraient être le signe d'une empreinte immunologique ht
RT @RobinMls_Mcln: Not to mention all involved, the companies, FDA & CDC et al, admitted they have NO DATA showing correlation of neutraliz…
@LarryBoorstein @HelenBranswell There is no available data from any study that suggests the bivalent vaccine leads to improved health outcomes. Zero controlled safety studies for the bivalent. The only available data is antibody titers, and the bivalent
@goodsirjames @CDCgov That article doesn't reach the conclusion it should be making. The studies themselves were small [~20 people, https://t.co/r64PT4c0oc, https://t.co/yBxhUiOCiJ], and assuming they're correct, they would boost at the same level as the o
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
be locked in place by overly narrow vaccines. this could, quite possibly, prevent long term sterilizing immunity from EVER developing in the vaccinated precisely BECAUSE they were vaccinated. Primates https://t.co/8aFgTwrVan Humans https://t.co/vuENjL8OqX
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
コロナ ワクチン 2価
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @EricTopol: New on the bivalent BA.5 vaccine booster immune response in people No better neutralizing antibody response to BA.5 than the…
RT @EricTopol: New on the bivalent BA.5 vaccine booster immune response in people No better neutralizing antibody response to BA.5 than the…
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!
RT @EricTopol: New on the bivalent BA.5 vaccine booster immune response in people No better neutralizing antibody response to BA.5 than the…
RT @yozo_oba: こたえ:初回のオミクロン側のスパイクを殆どの人は中和できないからただただダメージが大きいワクチンになってます、お早めのご接種を!