↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

How Strongly Does Appetite Counter Weight Loss? Quantification of the Feedback Control of Human Energy Intake

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
334 Mendeley
Title
How Strongly Does Appetite Counter Weight Loss? Quantification of the Feedback Control of Human Energy Intake
Published in
Obesity, November 2016
DOI 10.1002/oby.21653
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Polidori, Arjun Sanghvi, Randy J. Seeley, Kevin D. Hall

Abstract

To quantify the feedback control of energy intake in response to long-term covert manipulation of energy balance in free-living humans. A validated mathematical method was used to calculate energy intake changes during a 52-week placebo-controlled trial in 153 patients treated with canagliflozin, a sodium glucose co-transporter inhibitor that increases urinary glucose excretion, thereby resulting in weight loss without patients being directly aware of the energy deficit. The relationship between the body weight time course and the calculated energy intake changes was analyzed using principles from engineering control theory. It was discovered that weight loss leads to a proportional increase in appetite resulting in eating above baseline by ∼100 kcal/day per kilogram of lost weight-an amount more than threefold larger than the corresponding energy expenditure adaptations. While energy expenditure adaptations have often been considered the main reason for slowing of weight loss and subsequent regain, feedback control of energy intake plays an even larger role and helps explain why long-term maintenance of a reduced body weight is so difficult.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 250 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 334 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 330 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 15%
Student > Bachelor 46 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 13%
Researcher 37 11%
Other 32 10%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 80 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 78 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 35 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 27 8%
Sports and Recreations 26 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 7%
Other 48 14%
Unknown 98 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 450. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#62,836
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Obesity
#87
of 5,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,371
of 318,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity
#3
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,089 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.