@MikeMen2017 @kevpluck @ProfBillMcGuire You seem confused. Let me help you with that: https://t.co/SJjlJ9bdP6 https://t.co/b1rkZ99W7E
RT @MichaelEMann: @rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
Globally resolved surface temperatures since the Last Glacial Maximum | Nature https://t.co/QLUeixuBjG
RT @MichaelEMann: @rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
RT @MichaelEMann: @rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
RT @MichaelEMann: @rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
@InfoMeteoro O sea que estos estudios que prueban el calentamiento global y que se publican en @Nature son falsos? https://t.co/kK7Am8i99P https://t.co/p3H8OCEKVh
RT @MichaelEMann: @rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
RT @MichaelEMann: @rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
RT @MichaelEMann: @rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
@rgatess ALWAYS misleading see: https://t.co/OTPi3zn5HE
@wingdee @Daaanvdb @MichaelEMann I'm awfully sorry, but the facts are inconveniently on Mr Mann's side. And the work of Osman et al has replicated and extended it. Sorry to piss on your parade. https://t.co/OW2pSa2TGT
@HolzheuStefan Von 2021, noch klarer https://t.co/z04jgPRX4O https://t.co/QiZJp88Eyj
@Prinsje_J @Kronenberg211 Nee, de CO₂-concentratie VERSTERKT tijdens de glaciaal-interglaciaal cycli de opwarming, geïnitieerd door variaties in Milankovic-forcering. Lezen: https://t.co/H63IPcIaPG
@villainy_scum @ClimateDefiance Please identify any errors in these papers along with evidence that supports your assertion(s): https://t.co/PhXFATa1JG https://t.co/k09ySaCSq1 https://t.co/Oe7ZudlAua
@RobGoodall6 @JimBowersclimb @sjc_pbs Did you just try to use a custom Google Map to refute these papers? https://t.co/PhXFATa1JG https://t.co/k09ySaCSq1 https://t.co/Oe7ZudlAua
@lasee_frank LOL. Your source has Google search as source for this story. And no, it wasn't. https://t.co/Oj4VXLPigK How dumb. https://t.co/j16pYtGrEE
RT @virescent3000: @thomasgrusz @srfnews Der anthropogene Klimawandel ist nicht natürlich oder normal: "both the rate and magnitude of mode…
@thomasgrusz @srfnews Der anthropogene Klimawandel ist nicht natürlich oder normal: "both the rate and magnitude of modern warming are unusual relative to the changes of the past 24 thousand years." https://t.co/7NIXsuPaYV
@RobGoodall6 @JimBowersclimb @sjc_pbs Have you read these 3 papers? https://t.co/PhXFATa1JG https://t.co/k09ySaCSq1 https://t.co/Oe7ZudlAua
RT @TheDisproof: @NoTricksZone Why can't Tony disprove this https://t.co/2cFeMdHofm
@ute_lias @PauliVahtera Ei, tuo on dataa, eli havaintoaineistoa. Pyysit sitä, ja halusin varmistaa, haluatko tosiaan dataa. Ilmeisesti et sittenkään halua, vaan linkit tutkimuksiin. No, nehän löytyvät tuosta Fannin ketjusta. Osman et al. 2021 taitaa puuttu
43/J The hockey stick was confirmed in subsequent research by people other than Mann. https://t.co/NXLhfG5ldD https://t.co/ptBiZR2Uef https://t.co/ZXtzIbGgfa https://t.co/z5lDyMd2gi https://t.co/gpPqmwcndG https://t.co/t550lmp7vR https://t.co/RTXhdBRp8l
@KHermansa @Dirk15663 @ZDFheute Globally resolved surface temperatures since the Last Glacial Maximum: https://t.co/7NIXsuPaYV https://t.co/jlBjSKQ9ZW
@MikeSniderEngr @Tedastro @_ClimateCraze 71 studies with different proxies support it. Ossman et al support it. https://t.co/ofHmQXtIvJ If it was a lie, it would have been discovered long ago. https://t.co/7ZuJZEISjc
@Ross6040 I've read the original article in NatSciReports. It refers to *regional* temperatures (the Mediterranean) not *global*. - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am https://t.co/1t1ulY7GG1
@Ross6040 @ProfBillMcGuire The MWP was not global & probably even not that warm, e.g. - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm https://t.co/1t1ulY7GG1
@Ross6040 @ProfBillMcGuire Your link is a blog post with a cut-and-paste plot that ends in 2000 discussing regional temperature. The MWP was not global & probably even not that warm, e.g. - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am - https://t
@Ross6040 Your link is a blog post from 2013. More recent science shows that MWP was not global & probably not that warm, e.g. - https://t.co/YQMbpRA4am - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA - https://t.co/fnYGbU6XOm https://t.co/1t1ulY7GG1
@1984Disrupter @swedish_swedop @_ClimateCraze 71 studies proving it right are not enough? Here's one more! https://t.co/7ZuJZEISjc Here are also 101 Nobel laureates saying the opposite of what you claim https://t.co/Ylfy24Qinn
@BankersGallows @ProfMarkMaslin Natural cycles related to orbital forcing and solar output cannot account for the current warming. The extra anthropogenic CO2 (rich in C12) can. - https://t.co/Nc1wh96DTD - https://t.co/uGkl5uqqPA https://t.co/1WpJnTYOwb
RT @leafwax: I am 🌟thrilled 🌟that this is finally published! Led by my postdoc Matt Osman (no Twitter) let me introduce the first spatial r…
RT @leafwax: I am 🌟thrilled 🌟that this is finally published! Led by my postdoc Matt Osman (no Twitter) let me introduce the first spatial r…
@ClimateRetorts @dueyesterday @somedeepstuff1 @JonMny Which paper are you talking about exactly? Lacis et al. 2010? https://t.co/jUWKHWpPcq Rohde et al. 2013? https://t.co/9uTRTa22tx Hausfather et al. 2019? https://t.co/f4JMojRXFW Lynas et al. 2021? h