| Title |
Availability of essential diagnostics in ten low-income and middle-income countries: results from national health facility surveys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet Global Health, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s2214-109x(21)00442-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Harika Yadav, Devanshi Shah, Shahin Sayed, Susan Horton, Lee F Schroeder |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 70 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Pakistan | 2 | 3% |
| Spain | 2 | 3% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| India | 2 | 3% |
| Senegal | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 12 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 51 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 17% |
| Scientists | 5 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 12% |
| Other | 18 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 5% |
| Other | 23 | 13% |
| Unknown | 70 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 30 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 8% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 5% |
| Engineering | 7 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 28 | 16% |
| Unknown | 79 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 90. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#487,871
of 25,880,948 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet Global Health
#413
of 3,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,873
of 440,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet Global Health
#13
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,880,948 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 61.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,333 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.