| Title |
Synthesizing evidence in sustainability science through harmonized experiments: Community monitoring in common pool resources
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1073/pnas.2106489118 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul J Ferraro, Arun Agrawal |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 26% |
| Indonesia | 4 | 12% |
| Sweden | 2 | 6% |
| Germany | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| South Africa | 1 | 3% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 3% |
| Mexico | 1 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 26% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 47% |
| Scientists | 15 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Researcher | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 14 | 18% |
| Environmental Science | 12 | 15% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 12 | 15% |
| Unknown | 20 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,751,163
of 24,834,604 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#22,540
of 101,856 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,389
of 427,973 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#459
of 982 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,834,604 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,856 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,973 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 982 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.