↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Synthesizing evidence in sustainability science through harmonized experiments: Community monitoring in common pool resources

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
Title
Synthesizing evidence in sustainability science through harmonized experiments: Community monitoring in common pool resources
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, July 2021
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2106489118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Paul J. Ferraro, Arun Agrawal

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,080,660
of 18,432,973 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#16,599
of 91,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,055
of 169,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#255
of 606 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,432,973 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 169,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 606 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.