| Title |
The Rapid Evaluation of COVID-19 Vaccination in Emergency Departments for Underserved Patients Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Emergency Medicine, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2021.05.026 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Robert M. Rodriguez, Jesus R. Torres, Anna Marie Chang, Adrianne N. Haggins, Stephanie A. Eucker, Kelli N. O’Laughlin, Erik Anderson, Daniel G. Miller, R. Gentry Wilkerson, Martina Caldwell, Stephen C. Lim, Ali S. Raja, Brigitte M. Baumann, Joseph Graterol, Vidya Eswaran, Brian Chinnock, The REVVED UP Investigators, Graham Nichol, Blair A. Parry, Alaina Hunt, Morgan Kelly, Breena R. Taira, Michael Pham, Joshua Tiao, Kyra Lasko, Mayuri Aivale, Alex Farthing, Nicole Byl, Virginia Chan, Nancy Anaya, Angela H. Wong, Bhanu Chadalawada, Anna Tupetz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 297 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 120 | 40% |
| Canada | 21 | 7% |
| Australia | 3 | 1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Côte d'Ivoire | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Bosnia and Herzegovina | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 138 | 46% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 209 | 70% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 46 | 15% |
| Scientists | 29 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 13 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 86 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 32 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 12% |
| Unknown | 39 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 217. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2021.
All research outputs
#181,540
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#82
of 6,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,322
of 461,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#1
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 461,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.