↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Article Metrics

Credit Market Consequences of Improved Personal Identification: Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi

Overview of attention for article published in American Economic Review, October 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#28 of 3,348)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
74 Mendeley
Title
Credit Market Consequences of Improved Personal Identification: Field Experimental Evidence from Malawi
Published in
American Economic Review, October 2012
DOI 10.1257/aer.102.6.2923
Authors

Xavier Giné, Jessica Goldberg, Dean Yang

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Unknown 69 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 36%
Student > Master 10 14%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 5%
Other 16 22%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 50 68%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 12%
Computer Science 2 3%
Social Sciences 2 3%
Psychology 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 9 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 270. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2020.
All research outputs
#50,423
of 14,368,518 outputs
Outputs from American Economic Review
#28
of 3,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#339
of 149,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Economic Review
#1
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,368,518 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,348 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.