↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

ALS-associated mutation FUS-R521C causes DNA damage and RNA splicing defects

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Investigation, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
Title
ALS-associated mutation FUS-R521C causes DNA damage and RNA splicing defects
Published in
Journal of Clinical Investigation, April 2021
DOI 10.1172/jci149564
Pubmed ID
Authors

Haiyan Qiu, Sebum Lee, Yulei Shang, Wen-Yuan Wang, Kin Fai Au, Sherry Kamiya, Sami J Barmada, Steven Finkbeiner, Hansen Lui, Caitlin E Carlton, Amy A Tang, Michael C Oldham, Hejia Wang, James Shorter, Anthony J Filiano, Erik D Roberson, Warren G Tourtellotte, Bin Chen, Li-Huei Tsai, Eric J Huang

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2021.
All research outputs
#4,290,278
of 23,302,246 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#5,691
of 16,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,795
of 431,662 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Investigation
#90
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,302,246 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,662 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.