↓ Skip to main content

Michigan Publishing

Early volatile depletion on planetesimals inferred from C–S systematics of iron meteorite parent bodies

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
18 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Early volatile depletion on planetesimals inferred from C–S systematics of iron meteorite parent bodies
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2021
DOI 10.1073/pnas.2026779118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marc M. Hirschmann, Edwin A. Bergin, Geoff A. Blake, Fred J. Ciesla, Jie Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 49 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 29%
Researcher 8 16%
Other 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Student > Master 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 10 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 22 45%
Physics and Astronomy 5 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 18 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 163. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2021.
All research outputs
#237,776
of 24,622,191 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#4,496
of 101,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,075
of 429,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#133
of 1,117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,622,191 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 101,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 38.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.