| Title |
Female rats are not more variable than male rats: a meta-analysis of neuroscience studies
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biology of Sex Differences, July 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13293-016-0087-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jill B. Becker, Brian J. Prendergast, Jing W. Liang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 165 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 69 | 42% |
| Canada | 14 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| Germany | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| Norway | 2 | 1% |
| Israel | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 5% |
| Unknown | 55 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 94 | 57% |
| Scientists | 61 | 37% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 478 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 470 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 85 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 77 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 51 | 11% |
| Researcher | 46 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 27 | 6% |
| Other | 74 | 15% |
| Unknown | 118 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 133 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 55 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 36 | 8% |
| Psychology | 23 | 5% |
| Other | 48 | 10% |
| Unknown | 143 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 292. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 September 2023.
All research outputs
#122,373
of 25,750,437 outputs
Outputs from Biology of Sex Differences
#8
of 597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,526
of 381,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology of Sex Differences
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,750,437 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 597 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them