| Title |
Comparing Clinical Features and Outcomes in Mechanically Ventilated Patients with COVID-19 and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of the American Thoracic Society, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1513/annalsats.202008-1076oc |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael W. Sjoding, Andrew J. Admon, Anjan K. Saha, Stephen G. Kay, Christopher A. Brown, Ivan Co, Dru Claar, Jakob I. McSparron, Robert P. Dickson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 25 | 38% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Guinea | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 2% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 44 | 67% |
| Scientists | 13 | 20% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 8 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 13% |
| Unknown | 17 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 28% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 23 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#792,104
of 25,599,531 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#199
of 3,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,918
of 444,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the American Thoracic Society
#5
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,599,531 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,619 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.